Editorial Methodology
How we verify EndoPeak facts, rank evidence, handle conflicting sources and separate product marketing from independent research.
Our evidence hierarchy
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Randomized controlled trials
- PubMed-indexed clinical research
- Government and regulatory sources
- Recognized clinical organizations and academic institutions
- Seller sources for commercial facts and seller claims
Five editorial labels
| Verified product fact | Current label or primary documentation. |
| Seller claim | What the seller says; not automatically independently verified. |
| Independent evidence | Research or regulator/clinical source independent of the seller. |
| Consumer report | Anecdotal customer experience with sample-size limitations. |
| Limitation | What remains unknown, contradictory or unverified. |
Evidence distance
We do not treat a study on one ingredient as proof that the complete product works. The closer the evidence is to the exact finished product, dose, route, population and outcome, the stronger the inference. EndoPeak's central limitation is that we did not identify a randomized clinical trial of the finished formula.
Conflicting sources
When sources conflict, we show the conflict. Example: the current seller FAQ says to take the product after the first meal, while a label record says two capsules before bedtime. We do not silently choose the version that is more convenient.
Commercial data
Prices, shipping and refund terms are treated as time-sensitive. Pages show a checked date and direct readers to verify checkout.
Corrections
If a current label, seller term or evidence source changes, we update the relevant page and describe material corrections under our Corrections Policy.